Talk:Natuna Regency

Indonesia Low‑importance

	Indonesia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islands

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands articles

It is requested that an image or photograph of Natuna Regency be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Indonesia may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

earlier comment

The Natuna Islands are out of the the limit of Chinese claim, no matter on PRC or ROC maps. — Insta ntnood 15:49, May 17, 2005 (UTC)

There is a strange circular facility on Natuna-Besar Island. http://goo.gl/maps/rJfcg. Whatever it is, it's worth a mention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.84.213.24 (talk) 11:19, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's a mosque, and a very beautiful one at that. It has an article on the Indonesian Wikipedia. [1] 106.69.218.199 (talk) 16:57, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll mention it in Infrastructure section or Demographic section, perhaps, @User:83.84.213.24. May be it will be more useful if you open your new account and upload some of the picture to commons:Main Page. Cheers! Azmi1995 (talk) 17:34, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]